Is Dhaka Wasa personal property after all?

 Prof Sujit Kumar Bala has been appointed the new chairman of the Dhaka Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (Wasa) board. According to a circular issued on May 22, he succeeded former Dhaka Wasa chairman Dr Golam Mostafa, who, two days prior to being substituted, had alleged that Wasa had become the "personal property" of its managing director, Taqsem A Khan.

One would've hoped that the chairman's allegations would have been investigated with due diligence. Instead, he was sacked for speaking up. Needless to say, the move further explicates the disastrous depth of corruption in the organisation and the untouchable position of the Wasa MD. Reports after reports have provided evidence of the MD's wrongdoings, yet nothing has been done to hold him accountable. Even allegations from the chairman couldn't deliver a much-needed shake-up. So, the question is: what reasons do we have to believe that Wasa is anything but the MD's personal property?

Taqsem has been accused of various misdeeds over the years, including being selected and reappointed as the MD for six consecutive terms, in violation of Wasa's bylaws. His reappointments were deemed "questionable" by Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB), which also demanded a neutral audit of his performance. The audit is yet to be held.

During Taqsem's leadership, Dhaka Wasa hasn't been able to fix the city's waterlogging issue, in addition to failing to provide safe water to its customers. Given Wasa's repeated failure to resolve the issue of waterlogging, Dhaka's two city corporations took over drainage management in 2020. Additionally, it was discovered that the Buriganga River was polluted by Wasa's sewage systems.

The organisation has consistently refused to answer for its shortcomings, despite the fact that it has completely failed to enhance the quality of water it distributes to inhabitants (for instance, last year, the city had a significant cholera epidemic as a result of leaks in Wasa pipes). According to a TIB investigation, 62 percent of those who applied for water and sewer connections from Wasa said they encountered harassment and anomalies.

If dodging accountability, transparency, and governance were an art, either Wasa or its MD would've been maestros. Around 910 million litres of sewage are reportedly generated every day in the areas covered by Wasa. Of this, almost 900 million litres of raw sewage enter our freshwater sources, such as rivers and canals – meaning less than two percent of the sewage is being treated. In May, the National River Conservation Commission's chairman accused Dhaka Wasa of contaminating the rivers that surround the capital. No data can quantify the immense damage done to our water bodies as a result of Wasa's negligent and immoral activities.

Go Page

Residents paid Tk 1,066 crore between FY 2018-19 and FY 2020-21 for sewage treatment, a service that was barely provided. In FY 2021-2022, it was almost Tk 400 crore. Why, therefore, should citizens pay for a service that doesn't exist?